Unit Testing Template For Etla

I've seen this too. It is failing in the following scenario: • Create a new Minimal Template10 app project and build it.

Learn how to perform unit testing with TestComplete. Article includes a detailed example of unit testing. Unit Testing Template For Etl Developer. An open source extensible workflow engine written in C# with a cross platform manager app that works on Windows.

Most of the time many software testing guys are totally confused about Test Strategy and Test Plan Template. So I am writing this article for those who keen to learn. Unit Test Plan Module ID. [Specify how and where data is archived for use in subsequent unit tests. Unit Test Plan Template Author.

• Add a new Universal Unit Test project to the solution. • Add a reference from the test project to the app project. • Add a unit test that references a type from the app project's MainPage view model and build.

• Run the unit test in the debugger. Marvelous Clo3d V2.8.5 For Cloth Pattern Design 7-8-54 here. As the test loads, you get an error this exception: 'Cannot deserialize XBF metadata type list as 'BootStrapper' was not found in namespace 'Template10.Common'. [Line: 0 Position: 0]' These steps work fine in the basic Blank project that comes with VS.

As a way around this behavior, I moved my source code and xaml files to a class library that is referenced in the app and test projects. The app project just holds App.xaml & cs, Assets folder, Styles folder, and appx manifest.

Is your universal test app of the same type as the universal app? I came across this thread trying to debug a similar issue while using Prism. App.xaml.cs for the UAP using Prism had this: sealed partial class App: PrismUnityApplication which is a departure from the default: sealed partial class App: Application A newly created unit test app will also inherit from Application. Looking at the Blank app sample, I see a customized Application class: sealed partial class App: Template10.Common.BootStrapper Is the universal testing problem resolved duplicating this class definition into Template10/Template10 (Tests)/UnitTestApp.xaml.cs and changing the root of UnitTestApp.xaml from to. I also see this issue: • Create a Hamburger (Template 10) app. • Create a Unit Test App (Universal Windows) in same solution.

• Reference the Hamburger app from the Unit Test app and then when you run the default test in UnitTest.cs, you get the following: 'A user callback threw an exception. Check the exception stack and inner exception to determine the callback that failed. ========== Run test finished: 0 run (0:905) ==========' Will this be fixed soon as writing unit tests is a must have strategy for us whilst developing our UWP commercial app?

Hello, for what I found the issue seems not specific to Template10, but arises every time you inherit your App class from a custom class (not Windows.UI.Xaml.Application). In fact, similar issues are open on GitHub for Prism () and Caliburn.Micro (). A solution is given by Brian Lagunas for the Prism issue, and consists in decorating the App class (the one that inherits from Template10.Common.BootStrapper) with the Windows.UI.Xaml.Data.Bindable attribute. If the workaround seems not working at first, try to clean the solution and then build it again, it should work.

In addition, after some testing, I discovered that if you have a ResourceDictionary defined in a xaml file with an x:Class declaration (that's needed if you want to use x:Bind inside the resources defined in the dictionary), you have to apply Bindable attribute to that classes too. Hi, I see from a comment above that you tried changing the class definition of the UnitTestApp to Template10.Common.BootStrapper. So, if you still have that class definition in your unit test app, you have to apply the Bindable attribute both to that class and to the app class of the app you want to test. Or, maybe better, just revert the class of the unit test app to a normal Application class. Also, if you have any xaml file (other than the pages) with an x:Class attribute defined, you have to apply the Bindable attribute to that class too (in my case I had two resource dictionaries defined in this way). If this does not work, I fear I can't help more.

Honestly I have not had the time to investigate why Bindable attribute should make the trick, I only found the suggestion in the link I posted above and found it worked in my case (with the already mentioned addition about the resource dictionaries files). Yes, I confirm that I was able to run unit tests on a Template10 app with this workaround. It definitely seems a bug related to how the UWP Unit Tests app works rather than to Template10., nice to know the thing about ViewModelLocator. I am using MVVM Light too with a ViwModelLocator, but I didn't run into the issue because I slightly modified it to return the ViewModel instances via static properties that I call in the code behind of the views, in order to have a compile-time, strongly-typed DataContext that is more x:Bind-friendly, so I didn't have to store a ViewModelLocator instance in the application resources. Has anyone been able to debug their unit tests after adding [Bindable] to their application class to address this issue? Just to add some additional info about debugging: Although the Catastrophic Failure exception is thrown, it is not fatal. In fact, if you turn off 'Break when this exception type is user-unhandled', the unit test app will continue to run and the tests can be debugged as normal (and the test runner does not hang and can be re-ran without relaunching VS).